6,000 pieces of legislation. TIADA took a very active interest in a number of bills related
to the auto industry. Below you will find a summary of many of those
TIADA’s position, actions the association took to support, modify or oppose the bill and
the final fate of each piece of legislation. Please contact Danny Langfield at the TIADA
This bill proposed requiring that an airbag deployment history check box be placed on a
vehicle’s title. The seller of a motor vehicle would have to disclose on the vehicle's
certificate of title, by marking each applicable box on the certificate: (1) whether one or
more airbags on the vehicle deployed while the seller owned the vehicle; and (2) if one
or more airbags on the vehicle deployed while the seller owned the vehicle, whether each
deployed airbag was replaced in accordance with all applicable federal safety regulations
for an airbag installed in a vehicle of that make, model, and year. The bill also included
this language: “A person who sells a motor vehicle in this state commits an offense if the
person, with knowledge that the vehicle is not equipped with one or more airbags that
meet all applicable federal safety regulations of an airbag installed in a vehicle of that
make, model, and year, and with intent to defraud the buyer, does not disclose to the
buyer the absence of that equipment.” An offense under this section could have been as
much as a felony of the third degree.
What happened to the bill:
DID NOT PASS
The bill died in the Calendars Committee.
HB 310 Goolsby
This bill proposed allowing the owner of a vehicle to transfer a license
plate from one
vehicle to another if owned by the same person or remove the plates
and surrender them
to TxDOT
TIADA’s Position: Neutral
TIADA’s Action:
After months of negotiations and stakeholders meetings dealing with
temporary tags and
the future of transferring plates, it became apparent that plates staying
with the owners
was in the near future of the industry. The TIADA Legislative Committee
felt this bill
would not have a significant negative impact on our industry. TIADA
monitored this bill
throughout the session to ensure there wouldn’t be any unforeseen
negative impact.
What happened to the bill:
PASSED
The bill goes into effect January 1, 2008. (For more information on
this bill and how it
will effect you as a dealer, please see the June 2007 issue of the Texas
Dealer magazine,
Legal Corner, pg. 26.)
HB 372 Hodge
This bill proposed requiring any person selling used motor vehicles
to complete a
detailed statement of the vehicle's condition. The statement would include
a list of any
known problems or defects affecting the vehicle's mechanical system,
tires, brakes, and
any other defect that substantially affects the vehicle's use, value,
or safety. Furthermore,
the seller would have to allow the purchaser to arrange for inspection
of the vehicle,
including an inspection to be conducted away from the premises where
the vehicle is
offered for sale.
TIADA’s Position: Opposed
TIADA’s Action:
TIADA set up a meeting between the author of the bill and a TIADA dealer
so we could
explain our concern that requiring dealers to make such statements on
pre-owned vehicles
would open our dealers up to numerous lawsuits defending what someone
didn’t know.
We also shared our concern about arranging an inspection away from the
place of
business. TIADA filed in opposition to this bill in the Licensing and
Administration
Procedures Committee and had a number of dealers come to the Capitol
to inform
committee members of our position.
What happened to the bill:
DID NOT PASS
This bill died in the Calendars Committee.
HB 481 Jackson, Jim
This piece of legislation proposed creating an alternative to a written
notice of transfer.
TxDOT would establish procedures that would permit the transferor of
a motor vehicle to
electronically submit a notice of transfer to the department through
the department's
Internet website.
TIADA’s Position: Neutral
TIADA’s Action
TIADA monitored this bill through the session to make sure this procedure
was an option
for dealers, but not required.
What happened to the bill:
PASSED
The bill goes into effect January 1, 2008. (Please watch the Texas Dealer
magazine for
more information on this bill and how it will effect you as a dealer.)
HB 526 Goolsby
This bill proposed allowing a municipality to deny registration of a
motor vehicle if the
owner of the vehicle has an unpaid fine for a parking violation of a
vehicle.
TIADA’s Position: Opposed
TIADA’s Action:
TIADA informed the author of the bill that as written it would create
a problem for a
dealer once they received a vehicle and later found that they couldn’t
register that vehicle
due to debts owed by the previous owner. TIADA offered language to the
author that
would exclude auto dealers. Once the author accepted the language TIADA
dropped our
opposition to this bill.
What happened to the bill?
DID NOT PASS
The bill died on a point of order on the floor of the House.
HB 744 Dutton
This bill proposed that dealers be required to notify TxDOT of the discharge of a lien.
TIADA’s Position: Opposed
TIADA’s Action:
TIADA informed the author of the bill that we were concerned about the
process that
would need to be put in place to allow an individual to notify the department
to release a
lien. We raised a number of security issues and told the author that
this could eventually
result in two titles being issued. We also testified in front of the
House Transportation
Committee and voiced our concerns. We built some allies with other associations
as the
bill continued to move through the House and eventually into the Senate.
We sent an
email alert to TIADA members who lived in the areas represented by the
Senators on the
Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee. We encouraged
our members
to write letters and make phone calls expressing their concern about
the bill and asking
the Senators not to support this piece of legislation.
What happened to the bill?
DID NOT PASS
The bill died in the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.
HB 2559 Otto/SB 1632 Wentworth
This bill proposed allowing a dealer to sell or offer to sell a motor
vehicle online through
an advertisement on the Internet to a buyer who never personally appears
at the dealer's
established and permanent place of business.
TIADA’s Position: Neutral
TIADA’s Action:
After visiting with E-bay motors about the intent of the bill and offering
a few
suggestions that would insure this would not allow “tent sales”,
TIADA took no official
position on this bill.
What happened to the bill?
PASSED
This bill goes into effect immediately.
HB 2590 McCall
This bill is very broad. It proposed cleaning up a lot of old language
in the Finance Code
as well as providing some new definitions for “Holder” of
a retail installment contract. It
goes on to say that full payment of the outstanding balance of the debt
on a vehicle traded
in must be made within 20 days.
TIADA’s Position: Neutral
TIADA’s Action
TIADA had some concerns about this bill when it was introduced. We worked
with the
author on a number of occasions to help define the term “Holder”
and insert language
that would be more attractive to our dealers that enter into retail
installment contracts.
TIADA supported the idea requiring full payoff of the debt within 20
days on a vehicle
that had been traded in.
What happened to this bill?
DID NOT PASS
The bill died in the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.
HB 2828 Taylor/SB 1208 Carona
This piece of legislation would keep a motor vehicle accident report
or information in a
motor vehicle accident report confidential during a 30-day period immediately
after the
date the report is filed with the agency that holds the accident report
or the information.
TIADA’s Position: Opposed
TIADA’s Action:
TIADA introduced language to the authors that would exclude lien holders
from this bill
and essentially allow lien holders access to the information in an accident
report without
the 30 day waiting period. The authors accepted the modified language.
What happened to the bill?
DID NOT PASS
The bill died in the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.
HB 2958 Jackson, Jim/SB 1118 Carona
This was a comprehensive overhaul bill that attempted to move regulation
of both the
vehicle storage facility and tow truck industries from TxDOT to the
Texas Department of
Licensing and Regulation. Additionally, the bill would create drug testing
policies,
criminal background checks and a new licensing requirement for all tow
truck operators.
TIADA’s Position: Opposed
TIADA’s Action:
TIADA had a number of meetings with the tow truck industry as well as
the authors of
both these bills. We eventually came up with some compromise language
that would
exclude tow truck owners from many of the regulations. We also built
a great working
relationship with the tow truck industry and will continue to build
on that relationship as
we move forward.
What happened to the bill?
DID NOT PASS
The bill died in the House Calendar Committee.
SB 1617 Harris/HB 3461 Paxton
This TIADA Related Finance Company bill proposed allowing auto dealers
to sell a
purchaser's account to an entity which has at least 80 percent common
ownership with
the dealership or grant a security interest in a purchaser's account
but retains custody and
control of the account and the right to receive payments in the absence
of a default under
the security agreement.
TIADA’s Position: For
TIADA’s Action:
TIADA visited with the Comptroller’s office to get a better understanding
of the office’s
position and identified an author for our bill on the House and Senate
side.
Representative Paxton and Senator Harris agreed to carry the bill. The
bill was written to
allow dealers to have a related finance company to take advantage of
the federal income
tax savings as well as defer the payment of sales tax. On two occasions
TIADA organized
a group of dealers to come to Austin and walk the Capitol halls knocking
on doors and
visiting with various legislative offices to insure our position was
known. We also had
number of dealers sign cards in the Senate Transportation Committee
public hearing and
the House Ways and Means Committee public hearing. TIADA members and
legal
counsel publicly testified in favor of the bill in the respective committees
and lastly,
TIADA organized a number of letter writing campaigns as the bill moved
through both
chambers. Representative Harless and Orr signed on as authors and co-authors
of the bill.
Before final passage we included language that would negate any fiscal
note detrimental
to the bill. The result was a fee of no more than $1,500 that related
finance companies
will pay annually.
What happened to the bill:
PASSED
The bill goes into effect July 1, 2007. (For more information on related
finance
companies, please see pg. 10 of the June 07 issue of Texas Dealer magazine.
The
complete story of how TIADA was able to pass this legislation will be
featured in the
July 07 issue.)
HB 3577 Rose/SB 513 Harris
This bill came directly from the TIADA Legislative Agenda. It was the
result of many
hours of hard work and a great deal of input from TIADA leaders. The
bill proposed
requiring independent dealers to complete a basic dealer education course
before
receiving a general distinguishing number.
TIADA’s Position: For
TIADA’s Action:
As soon as the session got underway TIADA had meetings with Representative
Rose and
Senator Harris who both agreed to author our bill. TIADA organized meetings
and phone
calls with key legislators and other associations that helped us refine
the language and
garner support for the bill. Our legislation moved quickly through the
Senate
Transportation and Homeland Security Committee where our State President
testified in
favor of the bill. This was after he and a number of TIADA dealers spent
the day walking
the halls of the Capitol visiting the offices of committee members.
Within a week and a
half our bill was unanimously voted out of the full Senate and sent
to the House
Transportation Committee. TIADA members worked the House version of
the bill just
one week after testifying on the Senate side. After a day visiting legislators
and staff
members, TIADA leaders testified in favor of our bill in front of the
House
Transportation Committee. TxDOT also testified that night as a resource
witness and
raised some concerns they had with the bill. TIADA continued to work
the House
Transportation Committee to address any new found concerns. We also
met with the
TxDOT Motor Vehicle Division to see if we could iron out any misunderstanding
and
better explain our position on dealer education. TIADA and Representative
Rose’s office
continued to work the House Transportation Committee to gain support
for our bill.
TIADA also launched a letter writing and phone campaign from dealers
who lived in
areas of the state represented by key legislators. After a very informative
conversation
with Representative Rose’s office it became apparent that we did
not have enough
support within the House Transportation Committee to move our legislation
out. Then
TIADA started the long process of looking for a piece of legislation
that was moving
through the legislature that we could amend and attach our dealer education
legislation to.
Unfortunately, the session ended before any such opportunity presented
itself.
What happened to the bill:
DID NOT PASS
The bill died in the House Transportation Committee.
SB 227 Harris
This bill would allow the Texas Attorney General to perfect a “child
support” lien against
a motor vehicle owned by an individual who is behind on their child
support payment.
TIADA’s Position: Opposed
TIADA’s Action:
TIADA met with Senator Harris’s office to explain our reservation
with creating a
“hidden lien”. Senator Harris’s office asked us to
meet with the Attorney General to see if
we could come up with a compromise. After a number of meetings and phone
calls where
the AG’s office discussed their intent of the bill and TIADA explained
the title process
and our concern over hidden liens, Senator Harris asked the Senate Transportation
and
Homeland Security Committee not to move the bill.
What happened to the bill:
DID NOT PASS
The bill died in the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.
SB 1786 Carona/Hill
This bill proposed changing the process used to print and place temporary
tags on motor
vehicles. This was a rewrite of the current process that includes many
changes for auto
dealers.
TIADA’s Position: For
TIADA’s Action:
Many stakeholders have been working on this issue for some time. TIADA
has been very
involved for the past couple of years working with legislators as well
as various
stakeholders. We worked diligently with Senator Carona’s office
giving
recommendations and input throughout the process. As Carona’s
office spearheaded this
effort, they made sure the auto dealer community had a voice through
their respective
associations – and TIADA took full advantage of the opportunity
given. TIADA publicly
filled in favor of the bill in the Senate Transportation and Homeland
Security Committee.
What happened to the bill:
PASSED
(For more information on this bill and how it will effect you as a dealer,
please see the
June 2007 issue of the Texas Dealer magazine, Legal Corner, pg. 26.)
For the complete language of the bills described above, go to
http://www.house.state.tx.us