Dallas County Automobile Dealers Association

Legislative Wrap-Up 2007

Home
President Message
TX DOT
Legislative Wrap-Up 2007
TIADA Legislative Accomplishments
Dealer Location Licensing Requirements
Foreign Motor Vehicle rule
Quick Reference to Texas Dealer Laws
Message Board
Reasons why you probably shouldn't become a member
Is it a Lemon?
WHY SHOULD I JOIN AND PARTICIPATE IN DCADA
Legal Resources
Auto Auction Directory
DCADA Websites
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Compliance
Auto wholesale
Future Members (Membership Application)
Executive Committee 2008
Curbstoning Information
***Online advertising
Dealer License Information
Vendor Links

dcada.jpg

Advocacy
Legislative Wrap-up 2007
 
The more than 875 members of this association help shape the industry through a collective voice as we advocate at the Capitol in Austin. TIADA has the knowledge and clout to get things done and protect your business and your industry. The TIADA staff and full-time lobbyist work diligently to bring industry-related issues to the attention of state agencies, elected officials and other legislative representatives.
The 80th Texas Legislature came to a close on May 28, 2007, having considered over

6,000 pieces of legislation. TIADA took a very active interest in a number of bills related

to the auto industry. Below you will find a summary of many of those

bills, including

TIADA’s position, actions the association took to support, modify or oppose the bill and

the final fate of each piece of legislation. Please contact Danny Langfield at the TIADA

state office with any questions at 800.442-5944

HB 71 by Leibowtiz

This bill proposed requiring that an airbag deployment history check box be placed on a

vehicle’s title. The seller of a motor vehicle would have to disclose on the vehicle's

certificate of title, by marking each applicable box on the certificate: (1) whether one or

more airbags on the vehicle deployed while the seller owned the vehicle; and (2) if one

or more airbags on the vehicle deployed while the seller owned the vehicle, whether each

deployed airbag was replaced in accordance with all applicable federal safety regulations

for an airbag installed in a vehicle of that make, model, and year. The bill also included

this language: “A person who sells a motor vehicle in this state commits an offense if the

person, with knowledge that the vehicle is not equipped with one or more airbags that

meet all applicable federal safety regulations of an airbag installed in a vehicle of that

make, model, and year, and with intent to defraud the buyer, does not disclose to the

buyer the absence of that equipment.” An offense under this section could have been as

much as a felony of the third degree.

TIADA’s Position: Opposed

TIADA’s Action:

TIADA filed opposition to this bill when it was first introduced in the House

Transportation Committee. We were concerned about the burden of “knowledge” being

placed on a dealer who markets pre-owned automobiles. We worked with other

associations to introduce new language that was more acceptable to our industry and

helped the author with the intent of his bill. The bill now clearly states that this is an

effort to stop individuals from selling or installing “counterfeit airbags”.

What happened to the bill:

PASSED

This bill goes into effect September 1, 2007.

HB 285 Herrero

This bill proposed allowing an individual to defer collection of a consumer debt if the

individual is a member of the state military forces or a United States reservist and they

are ordered to active duty for a period of 30 days or more. This would apply to any

obligation or contract signed before the date the individual was ordered to active duty.

TIADA’s Position: Opposed

TIADA’s Action:

TIADA built a coalition with a number of associations that shared our concern including

the Independent Bankers, Credit Unions and others that represented businesses that offer

retail installment contracts. We voiced our position to various members of the house and

were able to raise enough concern to stop the bill.

What happened to the bill:

DID NOT PASS

The bill died in the Calendars Committee.

HB 310 Goolsby

This bill proposed allowing the owner of a vehicle to transfer a license plate from one

vehicle to another if owned by the same person or remove the plates and surrender them

to TxDOT

TIADA’s Position: Neutral

TIADA’s Action:

After months of negotiations and stakeholders meetings dealing with temporary tags and

the future of transferring plates, it became apparent that plates staying with the owners

was in the near future of the industry. The TIADA Legislative Committee felt this bill

would not have a significant negative impact on our industry. TIADA monitored this bill

throughout the session to ensure there wouldn’t be any unforeseen negative impact.

What happened to the bill:

PASSED

The bill goes into effect January 1, 2008. (For more information on this bill and how it

will effect you as a dealer, please see the June 2007 issue of the Texas Dealer magazine,

Legal Corner, pg. 26.)

HB 372 Hodge

This bill proposed requiring any person selling used motor vehicles to complete a

detailed statement of the vehicle's condition. The statement would include a list of any

known problems or defects affecting the vehicle's mechanical system, tires, brakes, and

any other defect that substantially affects the vehicle's use, value, or safety. Furthermore,

the seller would have to allow the purchaser to arrange for inspection of the vehicle,

including an inspection to be conducted away from the premises where the vehicle is

offered for sale.

TIADA’s Position: Opposed

TIADA’s Action:

TIADA set up a meeting between the author of the bill and a TIADA dealer so we could

explain our concern that requiring dealers to make such statements on pre-owned vehicles

would open our dealers up to numerous lawsuits defending what someone didn’t know.

We also shared our concern about arranging an inspection away from the place of

business. TIADA filed in opposition to this bill in the Licensing and Administration

Procedures Committee and had a number of dealers come to the Capitol to inform

committee members of our position.

What happened to the bill:

DID NOT PASS

This bill died in the Calendars Committee.

HB 481 Jackson, Jim

This piece of legislation proposed creating an alternative to a written notice of transfer.

TxDOT would establish procedures that would permit the transferor of a motor vehicle to

electronically submit a notice of transfer to the department through the department's

Internet website.

TIADA’s Position: Neutral

TIADA’s Action

TIADA monitored this bill through the session to make sure this procedure was an option

for dealers, but not required.

What happened to the bill:

PASSED

The bill goes into effect January 1, 2008. (Please watch the Texas Dealer magazine for

more information on this bill and how it will effect you as a dealer.)

HB 526 Goolsby

This bill proposed allowing a municipality to deny registration of a motor vehicle if the

owner of the vehicle has an unpaid fine for a parking violation of a vehicle.

TIADA’s Position: Opposed

TIADA’s Action:

TIADA informed the author of the bill that as written it would create a problem for a

dealer once they received a vehicle and later found that they couldn’t register that vehicle

due to debts owed by the previous owner. TIADA offered language to the author that

would exclude auto dealers. Once the author accepted the language TIADA dropped our

opposition to this bill.

What happened to the bill?

DID NOT PASS

The bill died on a point of order on the floor of the House.

HB 744 Dutton

This bill proposed that dealers be required to notify TxDOT of the discharge of a lien.

TIADA’s Position: Opposed

TIADA’s Action:

TIADA informed the author of the bill that we were concerned about the process that

would need to be put in place to allow an individual to notify the department to release a

lien. We raised a number of security issues and told the author that this could eventually

result in two titles being issued. We also testified in front of the House Transportation

Committee and voiced our concerns. We built some allies with other associations as the

bill continued to move through the House and eventually into the Senate. We sent an

email alert to TIADA members who lived in the areas represented by the Senators on the

Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee. We encouraged our members

to write letters and make phone calls expressing their concern about the bill and asking

the Senators not to support this piece of legislation.

What happened to the bill?

DID NOT PASS

The bill died in the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.

HB 2559 Otto/SB 1632 Wentworth

This bill proposed allowing a dealer to sell or offer to sell a motor vehicle online through

an advertisement on the Internet to a buyer who never personally appears at the dealer's

established and permanent place of business.

TIADA’s Position: Neutral

TIADA’s Action:

After visiting with E-bay motors about the intent of the bill and offering a few

suggestions that would insure this would not allow “tent sales”, TIADA took no official

position on this bill.

What happened to the bill?

PASSED

This bill goes into effect immediately.

HB 2590 McCall

This bill is very broad. It proposed cleaning up a lot of old language in the Finance Code

as well as providing some new definitions for “Holder” of a retail installment contract. It

goes on to say that full payment of the outstanding balance of the debt on a vehicle traded

in must be made within 20 days.

TIADA’s Position: Neutral

TIADA’s Action

TIADA had some concerns about this bill when it was introduced. We worked with the

author on a number of occasions to help define the term “Holder” and insert language

that would be more attractive to our dealers that enter into retail installment contracts.

TIADA supported the idea requiring full payoff of the debt within 20 days on a vehicle

that had been traded in.

What happened to this bill?

DID NOT PASS

The bill died in the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.

HB 2828 Taylor/SB 1208 Carona

This piece of legislation would keep a motor vehicle accident report or information in a

motor vehicle accident report confidential during a 30-day period immediately after the

date the report is filed with the agency that holds the accident report or the information.

TIADA’s Position: Opposed

TIADA’s Action:

TIADA introduced language to the authors that would exclude lien holders from this bill

and essentially allow lien holders access to the information in an accident report without

the 30 day waiting period. The authors accepted the modified language.

What happened to the bill?

DID NOT PASS

The bill died in the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.

HB 2958 Jackson, Jim/SB 1118 Carona

This was a comprehensive overhaul bill that attempted to move regulation of both the

vehicle storage facility and tow truck industries from TxDOT to the Texas Department of

Licensing and Regulation. Additionally, the bill would create drug testing policies,

criminal background checks and a new licensing requirement for all tow truck operators.

TIADA’s Position: Opposed

TIADA’s Action:

TIADA had a number of meetings with the tow truck industry as well as the authors of

both these bills. We eventually came up with some compromise language that would

exclude tow truck owners from many of the regulations. We also built a great working

relationship with the tow truck industry and will continue to build on that relationship as

we move forward.

What happened to the bill?

DID NOT PASS

The bill died in the House Calendar Committee.

SB 1617 Harris/HB 3461 Paxton

This TIADA Related Finance Company bill proposed allowing auto dealers to sell a

purchaser's account to an entity which has at least 80 percent common ownership with

the dealership or grant a security interest in a purchaser's account but retains custody and

control of the account and the right to receive payments in the absence of a default under

the security agreement.

TIADA’s Position: For

TIADA’s Action:

TIADA visited with the Comptroller’s office to get a better understanding of the office’s

position and identified an author for our bill on the House and Senate side.

Representative Paxton and Senator Harris agreed to carry the bill. The bill was written to

allow dealers to have a related finance company to take advantage of the federal income

tax savings as well as defer the payment of sales tax. On two occasions TIADA organized

a group of dealers to come to Austin and walk the Capitol halls knocking on doors and

visiting with various legislative offices to insure our position was known. We also had

number of dealers sign cards in the Senate Transportation Committee public hearing and

the House Ways and Means Committee public hearing. TIADA members and legal

counsel publicly testified in favor of the bill in the respective committees and lastly,

TIADA organized a number of letter writing campaigns as the bill moved through both

chambers. Representative Harless and Orr signed on as authors and co-authors of the bill.

Before final passage we included language that would negate any fiscal note detrimental

to the bill. The result was a fee of no more than $1,500 that related finance companies

will pay annually.

What happened to the bill:

PASSED

The bill goes into effect July 1, 2007. (For more information on related finance

companies, please see pg. 10 of the June 07 issue of Texas Dealer magazine. The

complete story of how TIADA was able to pass this legislation will be featured in the

July 07 issue.)

HB 3577 Rose/SB 513 Harris

This bill came directly from the TIADA Legislative Agenda. It was the result of many

hours of hard work and a great deal of input from TIADA leaders. The bill proposed

requiring independent dealers to complete a basic dealer education course before

receiving a general distinguishing number.

TIADA’s Position: For

TIADA’s Action:

As soon as the session got underway TIADA had meetings with Representative Rose and

Senator Harris who both agreed to author our bill. TIADA organized meetings and phone

calls with key legislators and other associations that helped us refine the language and

garner support for the bill. Our legislation moved quickly through the Senate

Transportation and Homeland Security Committee where our State President testified in

favor of the bill. This was after he and a number of TIADA dealers spent the day walking

the halls of the Capitol visiting the offices of committee members. Within a week and a

half our bill was unanimously voted out of the full Senate and sent to the House

Transportation Committee. TIADA members worked the House version of the bill just

one week after testifying on the Senate side. After a day visiting legislators and staff

members, TIADA leaders testified in favor of our bill in front of the House

Transportation Committee. TxDOT also testified that night as a resource witness and

raised some concerns they had with the bill. TIADA continued to work the House

Transportation Committee to address any new found concerns. We also met with the

TxDOT Motor Vehicle Division to see if we could iron out any misunderstanding and

better explain our position on dealer education. TIADA and Representative Rose’s office

continued to work the House Transportation Committee to gain support for our bill.

TIADA also launched a letter writing and phone campaign from dealers who lived in

areas of the state represented by key legislators. After a very informative conversation

with Representative Rose’s office it became apparent that we did not have enough

support within the House Transportation Committee to move our legislation out. Then

TIADA started the long process of looking for a piece of legislation that was moving

through the legislature that we could amend and attach our dealer education legislation to.

Unfortunately, the session ended before any such opportunity presented itself.

What happened to the bill:

DID NOT PASS

The bill died in the House Transportation Committee.

SB 227 Harris

This bill would allow the Texas Attorney General to perfect a “child support” lien against

a motor vehicle owned by an individual who is behind on their child support payment.

TIADA’s Position: Opposed

TIADA’s Action:

TIADA met with Senator Harris’s office to explain our reservation with creating a

“hidden lien”. Senator Harris’s office asked us to meet with the Attorney General to see if

we could come up with a compromise. After a number of meetings and phone calls where

the AG’s office discussed their intent of the bill and TIADA explained the title process

and our concern over hidden liens, Senator Harris asked the Senate Transportation and

Homeland Security Committee not to move the bill.

What happened to the bill:

DID NOT PASS

The bill died in the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.

SB 1786 Carona/Hill

This bill proposed changing the process used to print and place temporary tags on motor

vehicles. This was a rewrite of the current process that includes many changes for auto

dealers.

TIADA’s Position: For

TIADA’s Action:

Many stakeholders have been working on this issue for some time. TIADA has been very

involved for the past couple of years working with legislators as well as various

stakeholders. We worked diligently with Senator Carona’s office giving

recommendations and input throughout the process. As Carona’s office spearheaded this

effort, they made sure the auto dealer community had a voice through their respective

associations – and TIADA took full advantage of the opportunity given. TIADA publicly

filled in favor of the bill in the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.

What happened to the bill:

PASSED

(For more information on this bill and how it will effect you as a dealer, please see the

June 2007 issue of the Texas Dealer magazine, Legal Corner, pg. 26.)

For the complete language of the bills described above, go to

http://www.house.state.tx.us